Common Carries and the Usual Incidents of Travel Doctrine |
|
|
|
In Rothfeld v Capital Area Transportation Authority (No. 288938), the Court of Appeals held that plaintiff created a question of fact concerning the bus driver's alleged negligence and affirmed the trial court's denial of defendant's motion for summary disposition.
Plaintiff brought a person injury action based on the driver's negligent operation of the bus. She stated the bus driver, who appeared impatient, "floored it" causing the bus to accelerate quickly. As the driver accelerated, plaintiff, who was walking toward her seat, slid forward on the wet aisle (due to rainy conditions), fell backwards, and hit her head on the bus floor. Plaintiff's factual scenario was supported by another passenger's testimony.
|
|
Read more... [Common Carries and the Usual Incidents of Travel Doctrine]
|
U.S. DOT issues Federal Ban on Texting for Interstate Commercial Drivers |
|
|
|
On January 26, 2010, the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) issued a federal ban on text messaging while driving. The federal ban, aimed at increasing road safety, applies to interstate truck drivers and commercial bus and van drivers who carry more than eight passengers. While the ban does not address how it will be enforced, any truck or bus driver who texts while driving may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties as well as fines up to $2,750.00.
|
|
Read more... [U.S. DOT issues Federal Ban on Texting for Interstate Commercial Drivers]
|
Formal Notice for Action Against Transit Authority |
|
|
|
In Nuculovic v Hill, a published opinion, the Court of Appeals barred plaintiff's claim for failure to provide notice within the 60-day timeframe established by the Metropolitan Transportation Authorities Act of 1967, MCL § 124.401 et seq. This is the second transit related appellate decision in the past month that narrowly construed MCL 124.419. See our discussion of Pollard v Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation here.
|
|
Read more... [Formal Notice for Action Against Transit Authority]
|
Funding Approved |
|
|
|
House Approves Funding from Eaton County Transportation Authority and Other Local Entities
On December 11, 2009 the U.S. House of Representatives approved an appropriations bill that provides federal funding for the Eaton County Transportation Authority. The legislation, pushed in large part by Congressman Mark Schauer, includes $1,000,000 for the Eaton County Transportation Authority (EATRAN). The funding allocated to EATRAN in this legislation will allow EATRAN to purchase additional transportation vehicles and upgrade its current equipment. EATRAN serves the citizens of Eaton County by providing curb-to-curb public transportation in areas such as Delta Township, Grand Ledge, Charlotte, Eaton Rapids, Olivet, and other Eaton County cities. |
COA Rejects "Actual Prejudice" Test |
|
|
|
Court of Appeals Rejects "Actual Prejudice" Test and Requires Regional Transit Authorities to Receive Written Notice of Injury Claim
In Pollard v Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART), No. 288851, the Court of Appeals - reversing prior authority that failure to provide written notice was not fatal unless the authority could show actual prejudice from the lack of written notice held that the trial court improperly denied summary disposition because the statute clearly requires written notice within 60 days, which the plaintiff did not provide.
|
|
Read more... [COA Rejects "Actual Prejudice" Test]
|
|
|